Comments on: “WPF/e” is Silverlight http://ux-strategy.com/2007/04/16/wpf-is-silverlight/ Musings from Will Tschumy, Microsoft User Experience Evangelist Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:34:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: XAML Soup - XBAP vs. Silverlight 1.0 vs. Silverlight 2.0 « Stuart Cox’s Tech Punch http://ux-strategy.com/2007/04/16/wpf-is-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-211 XAML Soup - XBAP vs. Silverlight 1.0 vs. Silverlight 2.0 « Stuart Cox’s Tech Punch Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:01:40 +0000 http://ux-strategy.com/2007/04/16/wpf-is-silverlight/#comment-211 [...] “WPF/E” is Silverlight [...] [...] “WPF/E” is Silverlight [...]

]]> By: Will Tschumy http://ux-strategy.com/2007/04/16/wpf-is-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Will Tschumy Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:13:50 +0000 http://ux-strategy.com/2007/04/16/wpf-is-silverlight/#comment-6 Hi Al, It's a good question. Silverlight is a new technology, so it requires a small download to install (the 1.1 megs I mentioned). While it leverages the infrastructure of Vista, it's a new thing. Once installed, Silverlight will keep itself up to date. Hope this helps. Best. Will. Hi Al,

It’s a good question. Silverlight is a new technology, so it requires a small download to install (the 1.1 megs I mentioned). While it leverages the infrastructure of Vista, it’s a new thing. Once installed, Silverlight will keep itself up to date.

Hope this helps. Best. Will.

]]> By: Al http://ux-strategy.com/2007/04/16/wpf-is-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Al Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:25:14 +0000 http://ux-strategy.com/2007/04/16/wpf-is-silverlight/#comment-5 Excuse my ignorance, but do we need to download the plugin if we use Vista? I thought it had all the WPF stuff built in - or is this different? Will there be any conflicts using it on a Vista machine? Excuse my ignorance, but do we need to download the plugin if we use Vista? I thought it had all the WPF stuff built in – or is this different? Will there be any conflicts using it on a Vista machine?

]]>